Official Opening of the Conference:
The age of algorithms is fundamentally redefining the traditional concept of sovereignty. The central issue today is no longer merely the pace of technological advancement, but the preservation of autonomy at both the individual and systemic levels. How can we maintain control in a world where artificial intelligence is capable of predicting, influencing, and even replacing human decision-making? Especially since, at the national level, we have no direct control over either the software algorithms or the underlying hardware infrastructure… for now?
At this year’s Infoparlament, we will examine how a dual line of defense for sovereignty can be established:
In this approach, resilience no longer means forced adaptation, but rather the conscious management of technological exposure and the preservation of sovereign decision-making capacity.


Technology promises protection while simultaneously creating vulnerability. Where does the line lie between digital well-being and compulsive behavior shaped by algorithms? What responsibility do we have to ensure that future generations are not merely users, but conscious shapers of the digital space?


The cost of the digital experience is rarely immediately apparent.
Data-driven operations create convenience and a competitive advantage, while simultaneously opening the door to increased surveillance, cyber risks, and rising energy demands.
At what point does technology become a crutch rather than a help? The question is not whether we should give up convenience, but at what cost we maintain it.

How does an algorithm-driven world affect the opportunities available to disadvantaged communities? The panel will examine whether the mere availability of technological tools (tablets, 5G) is sufficient for genuine social mobility, or whether the lack of system-level competency development continues to perpetuate the digital divide at the intersection of extreme poverty and modern education.

The 2026 elections were marked by a particularly exciting battle among pollsters who published wildly divergent predictions. The result is known, but what are the lessons? How conservative is the opinion polling industry? How much have methods changed since the beginning? Is it better to survey in person, by phone, or using artificial intelligence? What other changes might digitalization bring?


How can we remain in control of our own decisions in a world where algorithms anticipate our needs even before we do? In the conference’s closing session, we will explore how to build conscious, autonomous individual digital resilience through cognitive control, critical thinking, and forward-looking educational strategies.


sociologist, Executive Director
Public Opinion and Social Research: Yesterday and Tomorrow, from Personal to Artificial
15:15
–
16:15

Editor, Host
In the Age of Coded Vulnerability
10:00
–
11:00

Hyper-optimistic futurist, transhumanist
Digital Shield or Algorithm Dependency
11:00
–
12:00

Mathematician, EdTech Expert
Building Individual Resilience in the Age of AI
16:15
–
17:15

futurist
The Balance Between Security and Innovation: The Price of Digital Well-being
13:00
–
14:00

Learning Researcher
Algorithms or Willpower? Individual Resilience or System-Level Competence
14:00
–
15:00

President
In the Age of Coded Vulnerability
10:00
–
11:00

associate professor, sociologist, political scientist
Public Opinion and Social Research: Yesterday and Tomorrow, from Personal to Artificial
15:15
–
16:15

One of Hungary’s most renowned physicians, a toxicologist, oxyologist, emergency physician, and adjunct associate professor
Digital Shield or Algorithm Dependency
11:00
–
12:00
The most important question is no longer the pace of technological advancement, but rather the decisions that will determine how these systems are integrated into our daily lives. Which decisions will strengthen digital self-determination, and which will create dependency without us even noticing?
It is precisely along this axis that we are redefining the boundaries of our security, education, freedom, and competitiveness.
At Infoparlament, we shed light on the context of these decision-making situations.
Behind our featured topics lies the same realization: resilience is not forced adaptation, but a conscious strategic choice of direction.
Technology promises both protection and exposure.
As we strive to ensure user safety with increasingly sophisticated systems, it becomes harder to distinguish the line between protection and dependency.
Where does the line lie between the digital shield and behavior shaped by algorithms?
What is our responsibility in ensuring that future generations are not merely users, but conscious shapers of this space?
The cost of the digital experience is rarely immediately apparent.
Data-driven operations create convenience and a competitive advantage, while simultaneously opening the door to increased surveillance, cyber risks, and rising energy demands.
At what point does technology cease to be a help and become an addiction?
Do we give up convenience, or do we maintain it?
Access to technology alone does not guarantee social inclusion.
Digital tools and infrastructure only become a true springboard for change when backed by the right environment, motivation, and vision.
Can technology transfer create opportunities where social and economic conditions are lacking?
Or does it merely reproduce inequalities on a different level?
The pace of technological change is increasingly at odds with traditional decision-making processes. Leaders must simultaneously respond to immediate pressures and chart a course that is sustainable in the long term. The balance lies not in speed, but in the clarity of vision behind the decisions.
When does rapid adaptation offer a real advantage?
When does haste become a risk?